Green Belt land in Redhill and Reigate under threat

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, May 14, 2009
Profile image for This is Surrey

This is Surrey

Sanctity of the Green Belt has been stripped to pave way for 10,000 homes in the borough.

The publication of the South East Plan informed councils across the region of the number of houses to be built each year until 2026.

The South East of England Regional Assembly (SEERA) has earmarked Reigate and Redhill as a key development area in the south-east.

It went further by calling for "small-scale local reviews of the Green Belt", which could spell disaster for the protective ring around London.

Reigate and Banstead Borough Council, which fought to reduce its allocation of homes from 11,240 to 10,000, this week viewed the revised plan as a victory.

But the figure remains 2,260 homes higher than the borough's first allocation drafted in 2006.

The borough council, which must provide 500 new homes each year for the next 17 years, says it has already built 50 per cent of the required houses.

A spokesman also told the Mirror that it was confident the new homes allocation meant that building on the Green Belt could be avoided.

But Reigate MP Crispin Blunt slammed the plans, claiming the Government's "top down" approach could create an "urban sprawl" from the capital.

He said: "Regardless of the local reviews, the plans will mean that Hazel Blears, the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government can, push ahead with developments on the Green Belt.

"This will leave the council in a position where it has to constantly contest plans. It's an expensive process – and a nightmare."

He called for a "bottom up" approach where "local authorities can balance the trade-off between damage to the environment and benefits to residents".

Green Party member Jonathan Essex said developers would push for Green Belt construction over brown field sites in towns.

Slamming SEERA's plans as "ridiculous", he said: "It's cheaper for them [develop- ers] to build in open Green Belt areas.

"Our surroundings should be protected. The Green Belt is our future."

The draft proposals drawn up by SEERA in 2006 prescribed 7,740 new homes in Reigate and Banstead borough.

This figure was increased by 1,500 in 2007 and then upped by a further 2,000 last year after an announcement by Ms Blears.

Despite a review by an independent panel of inspectors, she revised the total to 11,240.

Describing the allocation and proposed Green Belt building as "naïve if not illegal", the borough council made its objections in October last year.

Councillor Michael Miller, executive member for planning, transport and housing, talking this week, said: "I am delighted to see that the Government has listened to the council and reduced our allocation".

6
Tweet this article
Report

6 Comments

  • Profile image for This is Surrey

    by David_S, Horley

    Thursday, May 28 2009, 10:14AM

    “Now our green belt protection has been reduced & local politicians must aggressively challenge all developers.

    It brought to mind a local paper's headline of 2 or 3 years ago ago. A local councillor had evicted a neighbour's grazing horses from an empty field as he bought it for his children to play in.

    It would be interesting to know how many such plots of green belt local politicians own on the edges of our towns.”

  • Profile image for This is Surrey

    by Winston Matthews, Horley, Surrey

    Monday, May 18 2009, 1:24PM

    “I certainly do not agree with building on Green belt land!”

  • Profile image for This is Surrey

    by Glyn, Merstham

    Friday, May 15 2009, 10:35PM

    “Why do they need to build on Green Belt land when there are so many office buildings that are laying empty and no one wants. Look at Redhill alone and see how many newly built offices remain empty. Why spoil our beautiful countryside when all it needs is developers to build what we really need... houses not offices that remain empty for years and all the council taxes lost. Surely the councils can stop giving out planning permission for premises never likely to be let or sold as it is them who lose money while they stand empty and it wont get any better with companies closing down rather than expanding, whilst we all need extra housing.”

  • Profile image for This is Surrey

    by Gadfly, England

    Thursday, May 14 2009, 10:49PM

    “At least Labour is keeping its promises - John Prescott said in January 1998 :

    "The green belt is a Labour achievement, and we mean to build on it."”

  • Profile image for This is Surrey

    by Peter Cole, Ockley

    Thursday, May 14 2009, 2:53PM

    “The sad part is that this will not be the end of it. Give it 10 years and yet more houses will be required. Anyone who has seen the Crawley/ Horsham development sprall pver the past few years may well live to see the day when London meets the sea in continuous concrete and bricks.”

  • Profile image for This is Surrey

    by Graham Williams, Caterham-on-the-Hill

    Thursday, May 14 2009, 12:08PM

    “Why is our green belt gradually being eaten away, soon there will be nothing left of it, and all we can show our grandchildren will be photo's. Hazel Blears is a blot on the landscape. in more ways than one.............. This makes me so Damn Angry”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Add your comments

        max 4000 characters