This Week's Issue: Are Mole Valley's roads safe for cyclists?

Trusted article source icon
Thursday, May 10, 2012
Profile image for Leatherhead Advertiser

Leatherhead Advertiser

CYCLISTS have flocked to Mole Valley since the announcement of the 2012 Olympic road race routes, which will come through the district and include several circuits of Box Hill.

But extra bikes have meant more tension with motorists and fears over cycle safety. Last week we asked: "Do you think Mole Valley's roads are safe for cyclists?"

  1. HOT SPOT:  Racing on Box Hill during last year's London-to-Surrey cycle classic

    Racing on Box Hill during last year's London-to-Surrey cycle classic

"NO WAY," said Sandra Harris. "The roads are too busy, too narrow in some places and in such bad condition. I have witnessed too many near-misses."

Freda Andrews said: "The massive potholes make the roads lethal for cyclists – not too good for a car's suspension either."

Takeaway £9.95 per person
Any 1 Main Dish, Any 1 Side Dish, Rice or Nan

Terms: Not to be used in conjuction with any other offer.
Duck, House Special and King Prawn £3 extra per person. Sunday offer has to be mentioned when you order.

Contact: 01306 770432

Valid until: Tuesday, December 31 2013

Richard Brooke said: "No – aggressive drivers and poor surfaces. Needs urgent attention, especially given the importance of the sport to the district."

And Councillor Dave Howarth (Lib Dem, Leatherhead North) said: "No. Roads not wide enough and drivers not aware enough of cyclists."

John Meudell, the Cyclists' Touring Club representative for Mole Valley, said: "If you are very good, very wide awake and very assertive then it's no more difficult than anywhere else.

"But the majority of people aren't like that. Cycling isn't a viable option for many, many people and it should be.

"Surrey County Council needs to start taking the issue of cyclists' safety seriously, professionally and competently."

But while many readers highlighted the dangers faced by cyclists, others said those riding bikes often created the danger themselves.

Commenting on Twitter, Jennie Cochrane wrote: "They would probably be safer if cyclists actually used the cycle lanes provided, which many don't (A24 in particular)."

And Alan McDonald said: "It is not the roads that are dangerous, but the influx of lycra-clad lunatics the vast majority of whom have no concern for anyone other than themselves.

"They rampage around with no regard for pedestrians, horse riders or car drivers, they ignore the Highway Code as they ignore traffic lights. The sooner these clowns are forced to have number plates, tax and insurance the better.

"As for allowing racing on public roads, this is a total disgrace and shows a severe disregard for local taxpayers' right of free movement."

0
Tweet this article
Report

Comments

  • Profile image for mvmashtead

    by mvmashtead

    Thursday, May 10 2012, 7:05PM

    “Some fair points there JimOfSurrey but at the same time you have to recognise the serious drop off in this modern dumbed-down (a pejorative term) mentality when - let's just use as an example, biker's and motorist's behaviour on a roundabout?

    They have little or no understanding that if they are positioned in the left slip, they're going straight over NOT TURNING RIGHT across those who have signaled right and who are exiting the second exit. If they're in the right slip they're turning to go around the roundabout or taking the second exit NOT GOING STRAIGHT ON.

    One enters a roundabout in the normal lane which might be slowed due to traffic on the roundabout and the traffic stacks up on the right lane only for the 'whizzers' and Neanderthals to force themselves into the traffic going straight on, causing mayhem, holdups and preventing those who are turning right from doing so.

    Are the roads in Mole Valley safe for cyclists? – NO would be my answer when in reality it's the drivers and bikers lack of grey matter that is patently unsafe.”

  • Profile image for JimOfSurrey

    by JimOfSurrey

    Thursday, May 10 2012, 1:42PM

    “There probably is an arrogance amongst the 'cycling community' as there probably is at any sports/enthusiasts level from bicycles to motor bikes to motor cars.

    However, we are all potential bicycle riders just as we are motorists. I don't particuarly care about climbing Box Hill every day. I do however care about just getting to a local shop or cycling with my son to school without fear, intimidation and being treated like a second class citizen. I passed my cycling proficiency in 1979 and did so well I got a free copy of the highway code :) I'd like to think it also made me a better driver. It's a shame how children nowadays often don't get the chance to take up this life skill.

    To go back to your point some reasons why people 'don't think the Highway Code applies to them' is because they are often trying to mitigate against very hostile situations, often favouring the pavement on very dangerous stretches (doing cyclists or pedestrians no favours). They just aren't made to feel welcome on the roads any more with high speeds, mobile phone use and a general 'ME FIRST' attitude from motorists. This is no excuse for bad behaviour whether you are behind handlebars or a steering wheel - indeed when I'm stopped at a red light on my bicycle, my blood boils when a cyclist weaves past me. There does however need to be more safe and direct routes so people of all ages and ability can get out on a bicycle and get to work, school, the shops or just enjoy Mole Valley, Surrey and beyond.”

  • Profile image for surrey_scot

    by surrey_scot

    Thursday, May 10 2012, 1:18PM

    “What I am trying to say, JimOfSurrey, is that it seems it is *never the cyclists fault*.

    I see cyclists do stupid things on a daily basis. I could include motor-cyclists in this too. I live very near Rykas Cafe, and I can say with one hundred percent confidence that at least three quarters of motor-cyclists do not ride the Burford Bridge roundabout safely, yet the moment one is knock off their bike by a car the first reaction is, "What can we do to stop car drivers hitting bikes?", rather than, "How can we stop bikers riding dangerously?"

    But, going back to ordinary cyclists, you cannot deny that there is a certain amount of arrogance within the cycling community. I see it all the time. I was once asked to move out of the way of three cyclists (Mum, Dad & young son), in a completely pedestrian area but when I politely pointed this out, guess who got the torrent of expletive abuse? Great example for the father to set his son.

    All I am saying is that sometime problems are tackled completely from the wrong end.”

  • Profile image for JimOfSurrey

    by JimOfSurrey

    Thursday, May 10 2012, 12:24PM

    “It's weird. A runaway lory causes damage to someone's house and no-one comments (http://tinyurl.com/7fb9fmn), yet when a story crops up that could encourage sensible, constructive discourse about the humble bicycle and the stupid comments start. Is it cyclists that kill and maim on a daily basis? I don't think so and is probably a reason why many people on bicycles use the pavement in the first place. This is a county where many children are denied the simple right of cycling to school because the roads are deemed too dangerous and where facilties are provided, they are usually a waste of money because no cycling group was consulted and look as though they were designed with a blindfold after drinking a bottle of vodka.”

  • Profile image for surrey_scot

    by surrey_scot

    Thursday, May 10 2012, 10:52AM

    “Personally I don't care if the roads are safe for cyclists or not because most of the time they are on the pavements anyway, or flying around corners into subways that are quite clearly sign posted "Cyclists Dismount" - I have lost count of the number of times I have almost been hit by a cyclist walking in or out of the Westhumble Street subway under the A24.

    Why do cyclists think that the highway code does not apply to them. If they spent more time obeying the rules of the road and less time doing things like creeping through red lights because they "don't really apply to cyclists", then maybe the roads would be safer for them.”

  • Profile image for surrey_scot

    by surrey_scot

    Thursday, May 10 2012, 10:50AM

    “Personally I don't if the roads are safe for cyclists or not because most of the time they are on the pavements anyway, or flying around corners into subways that are quite clearly sign posted "Cyclists Dismount" - I have lost count of the number of times I have almost been hit by a cyclist walking in or out of the Westhumble Street subway under the A24.

    Why do cyclists think that the highway code does not apply to them. If they spent more time obeying the rules of the road and less time doing things like creeping through red lights because they "don't really apply to cyclists", then maybe the roads would be safer for them.”

        Your comments awaiting moderation

        Be the first to comment

        max 4000 characters
         
         
         
         
         
         

        Tell us about your area

        Got some interesting news? Write about it and let your whole community know.

          Write an article